Weather
Five Big Issues For The New Congress"There's no doubt for us to take on climate in a serious way would involve making some tough political choices and understandably, I think the American people right now have been so focused and will continue to be focused on our economy and jobs and growth that if the message is somehow we're going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, I don't think anybody's going to go for that -- I won't go for that." However, last year's extreme weather did manage to bring the issue back to the forefront of national discussion. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, an independent who for a long time would not endorse a 2012 presidential candidate, endorsed Mr. Obama after superstorm Sandy ravaged the Eastern seaboard. Extreme weather has become a pressing problem for transportation systems all across the country, not just in New York. A few lawmakers have expressed interest in reviving the issue on the Hill: Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., plans to lead weekly meetings to craft what she called a "major bill" to lower carbon emissions and "harden our infrastructure to protect our people against extreme weather." Meanwhile, incoming Sen. Angus King, an independent from Maine, is an advocate for developing alternative energy sources like wind and solar power. Some of the greatest motivation for Congress to act this year may come from California: The state is beginning its cap-and-trade program, making it the largest carbon marketplace in the nation. If the effort to cut carbon pollution succeeds without hurting the economy, other states -- and perhaps Congress -- could consider following suit. 5. Tax reform During December "fiscal cliff" negotiations, both Mr. Obama and House Speaker John Boehner were looking for hundreds of billions in new revenue in 2013 through a tax reform process that eliminated some tax deduction and closes loopholes. Ironically, the deal that emerged may have complicated the bipartisan goal of comprehensive tax reform -- instead of closing loopholes, the deal in fact added $70 billion worth of new loopholes. Nevertheless, leaders in Congress say the deal laid down a foundation for real reform. "Now that we have prevented a Democrat tax increase, the Ways and Means Committee will lead the effort to reform our tax code to make it simpler and fairer for families and small businesses, while also making American businesses and workers more competitive in the global marketplace," said Rep. David Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the tax-writing House committee. The president has also expressed interest in working on individual and corporate tax reform -- and they may have to if they're looking for more revenues from the upcoming debt ceiling and "sequester" debates, since Republicans say they're done raising tax rates. |
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled.
Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
|
You have indicated this comment should be removed.
The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .
Kathleen Tonn/ Move the Mountain Ministries... said on Monday, Jan 28 at 5:54 PM
Has Senator McCain considered the viability of requiring illigal immigrants to join the armed forces? By imposing a two year term of service, the U.S. will find out just how much the illegals value America. The benefit to them is citizenship, training and an opportunity for a college education! Why not? What could possibly impinge on rolling this out? If congress could roll out Chapter 33 when the VA was not even prepared, couldn't congress step up and create a reasonable immigration policy such as was just described?
112406335don't steal... said on Monday, Jan 7 at 10:29 AM
the government hates competition...debate over...
110781462Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:56 PM
Just to clarify there are two of us guests (Guest and guest). But I noticed he/she was thinking faster than he/she was typing as well. So if anyone wants to debate Guest (me) my posts were at 2:58pm and 3:05pm.
110616922had much coffee today guest? said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:46 PM
lol...just kidding...
110616415guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:25 PM
Start w/house n senate n president taking pay cuts and have to live within their means. No additional fees or earnings from outside thier offices- only pay they get are from their paychecks-no special interests... just like joe civilian. Their pay needs to be reflected in thier job performance or in line w/how they do thier job. Nothing should be an entitlement, everything needs to be earned. They have to live under thier laws that they past first and foremost. I know that they have to feel like they did their job by passing laws... but there should be limits. republic vs democratic-which do we need. Simplify everything... they need to they are only at a 10th grade level, according to some report; taxes, bills, writings need not be convoluted so no one can understand them. no polls allowed- no special interests that cover this or that. KISS everything.
110615472Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:05 PM
I know this is a broken record but when Clinton left office we had a surplus. Meaning we were taking in more than we were spending. Bush comes along and says that is your money so he gave us a tax break. All along passing medicare part D which the CBO said would raise costs. He also started two unfunded wars that have yet to be paid for. If we would have stayed the course Clinton laid out for us our debt would be half of what it is now and shrinking. Unless we want to bury our children and grandchildren in debt the hard choices (cuts and tax increases) have to be made. No one will like it but it is what needs to be done.
110614655Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 3:58 PM
As far as the spending goes as a left leaning independent I know cuts have to be made. But it just can't be a across the board cut. There are things that the government does need to do. From what I see the left only wants defense cuts and the right only wants social cuts. If the right wants to cut social programs then they should be willing to match those cuts on the defense end. Once we have a balanced budget we ultimately need more taxes. I know that is blasphemous to the right but hear me out. Once the budget is balanced we have to tackle the debt. If we cut to much to achieve that goal it could hurt the economy and Americans. We should be taking in anywhere between 15-20% over the budget (and not for more spending as some on the right will try to scare you with). 5-6% of that goes just towards the interest alone leaving the remaining to bring the debt down. Once the debt is down (which will take decades) then and only then can taxes go back down to a balanced budget level.
110614361Add a comment
Most Popular