FAIRBANKS — Political attitudes may come and go in Alaska, but not much has been as consistently popular with the state’s voters as a transportation bond package.
Since statehood, Alaska voters have only turned down one loan package to pay for transportation items, and that thumbs-down happened all the way back in 1968. In that case, the rejected ferry construction project needed to wait only until the next general election, in 1970, for approval.
“You can look at no other kind of bond that’s as popular with the public,” said John MacKinnon, executive director of the Associated General Contractors of Alaska.
The latest measure, Bonding Proposition A, will go before voters on Tuesday. It will ask whether the state should borrow $453 million for a package of 36 construction projects throughout Alaska.
The biggest item in the package, which includes projects throughout the state, is a $50 million expansion of the Port of Anchorage. It also includes four projects in the Fairbanks area that total about $50 million.
MacKinnon, whose organization represents Alaska contractors, is an enthusiastic supporter. He thinks voters will be, too.
Representative Mike Doogan, an Anchorage Democrat who voted “no” when the bond measure came forward for a House vote, has been critical of the measure.
With billions in state savings, Doogan said it doesn’t make any sense to take out a loan — even one with low interest — to pay for capital projects. Doogan said it’s an approach in which legislators can spread the impact of their spending decisions out over decades, which he believes is an irresponsible practice.
In addition to forwarding the bond package to voters, the Legislature approved $2.9 billion in spending on a variety of other capital projects last session. Doogan said the items in the transportation bond could have easily been added to that budget.
“It’s just politics, that’s all it is,” said Doogan, who isn’t running for re-election. “It’s not wise fiscal policy, it’s not trying to save money for the future. It’s nothing like that.”
Doogan, however, didn’t get any of his colleagues to agree. The Senate voted unanimously to forward the bond measure to voters, and the House approved the move by a 38-1 vote. Doogan also voted for the final version, saying he didn’t see the point of standing in the way of its inevitable passage.
MacKinnon, who was deputy commissioner of DOT under Gov. Frank Murkowski, said there’s a reason why transportation packages tend to win support from both voters and lawmakers — Alaska is “starved for transportation.” The state has about 14,000 road miles, less than Vermont, he said.
“That kind of tells you how we’re hurting, and transportation affects everyone, every day,” he said.
MacKinnon also credits the Legislature’s willingness to fund transportation projects as a factor that helped the state weather the global recession.
“It has really helped keep Alaska from getting kicked with the recession that the rest of the country was hit with,” he said.
You have indicated this comment should be removed.
The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .
VOTE NO said on Saturday, Nov 3 at 2:36 PM
they cant even keep the grass cut
105597346ERIC WITHOLDER said on Saturday, Nov 3 at 4:03 PM
I'll be voting NO on spending MORE money and getting MORE debt. The Dems will do ANYTHING to enslave us to debt and deficits.
105603275Dave said on Saturday, Nov 3 at 4:44 PM
Reconstruction how about more new construction into the subdivisions the state has been selling and selling and selling
105605685ken stevens said on Saturday, Nov 3 at 7:58 PM
seriously? another $50 million dumped into the black hole of the port of anchorage? how many teachers would that buy? vote no.
105617671Frank said on Saturday, Nov 3 at 10:40 PM
Would love to red this article, but can't because of the STUPID Lithia Dodge ad that i can't close and continues to slide down the page as I'm trying to read. Now I now know you need to turn a buck and are struggling in these electronic/internet times, but come on...I can't even read the article!!!
105625306Robo said on Sunday, Nov 4 at 10:43 AM
Vote NO! With billions in our savings, they ask us to authorize the borrowing of millions...how stupid are we Alaskans. We need to build and maintain our infrastructure, but we need to be more thoughtful in our spending and programming of projects. Personnally, I'm tird of seeing roads replaced only to start to decay a few short months after completion...come on, we can do better!
105665666Niki said on Monday, Nov 5 at 4:02 PM
I got an idea! Why not make the oil & gas players build the roads, port, etc. THEN they can have the tax cuts!
105789131Add a comment
Most Popular