Halcro vs. Wielechowski in Oil Tax Debate

A debate on how much ACES should be changed

Tools

By Bill McAllister
Bio | Email

Story Created: Feb 26, 2013 at 10:47 AM AKDT

Story Updated: Feb 26, 2013 at 10:47 AM AKDT

ANCHORAGE - Call it the oil tax smackdown.

Two powerhouse orators debated the governor's bill for a major reduction in oil production taxes.

The forum was the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce’s weekly “Make It Monday” event at the Dena’ina Center.

Democratic Senator Bill Wielechowski says capital expenditures on the North Slope have been strong since the tax system known as ACES was passed in 2007.

"We're at all-time highs right now -- $2.4 billion. Next year, it's slated to go to 3.2. The following year it's slated to go to $3.8 billion. We’ve never had more investment than we have on the North Slope today."

But former Representative and former gubernatorial candidate Andrew Halcro says that spending is mostly on maintaining 35-year-old infrastructure, rather than exploring for new oil.

"If Senator Wielechowski wants to lay his hand on the fact that capital improvement, or capital expenditures, are at an all-time record, where's the production?"

Wielechowski noted the production decline began in the late 1980s, long before ACES.

"If the philosophy that low tax rates leads to more investment, more production, works, why didn't it work for 30 years? Why didn't it work for 10 years at Kuparuk when you had oil prices tripling to all time highs? It didn't work then."

Halcro says there's no risk for the state in giving incentives for more production.

"If we pass meaningful tax reform today and it works, it sets our economy right, that's great. If it doesn't, Senator Wielechowski can do just what he did six years ago, he can go in and raise taxes. The state always has the last word."

Halcro said the legislature in 2007 acted in a fit of emotion after a public corruption scandal.

"It was about ignorance. It was about lawmakers actually espousing in public that companies make no investment decisions based on the tax rates."

But Wielechowski said there must be some guarantee about investment.

"Let's try a different approach. Let’s tie our tax rate to new production, new investment. You invest more, you produce more, we lower your taxes."

And of course the winner of the debate is in the eye of the beholder.

This debate grew out of Wielechowski’s challenge to governor Parnell, which Parnell declined.

Halcro, the new chamber president, then contacted Wielechowski to set up Monday's event.
 

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

jwb1957 said on Tuesday, Feb 26 at 2:19 PM

I takes 10 years from discovery to production for new oil. New oil isn't going to come out the existing wells. Exxon and BP arent exploring. OK Exxon has a gun to their head to develop Point Thompson but thats also under ACES. Giving OUR oil away makes no sense when the profits are being shipped elsewhere and jobs are being imported from the small states.

114630081
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.