Feds prevent prosecution of Bill Allen for sex crimes

"There was no rationale offered. It was just simply that they were not going to do it. They're not required to explain themselves to us, and to my knowledge they have not."

Tools

By Bill McAllister
Bio | Email


Bill Allen walked out of federal custody today.


But secrets about a portion of his past are still locked up at the federal Department of Justice in Washington, D.C.


The key figure in the public corruption probe known as Operation Polar Pen has ended his incarceration for bribing state legislators in 2006.


But as Allen gains his freedom, questions remain about how he managed to avoid prosecution for numerous allegations of soliciting teenage and underage prostitutes.


Did the federal government sell out victims of sexual abuse in order to nail some politicians for taking cheap bribes?


“It certainly has that outward appearance,” said Anchorage Police Department spokesman Lt. Dave Parker. “However, I don't know why those decisions were made as they were made. And it would certainly, I think, please the people of the state of Alaska to find those things out."


The probe netted several convictions, but three were overturned, some politicians long under suspicion were never charged, and federal prosecutors themselves came in for widespread condemnation, with one of them committing suicide.


Meanwhile, Allen, the key prosecution witness, seems to have evaded charges for sex crimes.


At issue:


A federal Justice Department decision in 2004 to call off an Anchorage police investigation, and another decision a year ago to prevent the state Department of Law from pursuing a charge against Allen under a federal statute.


"And I certainly feel here at APD some of those who were involved have a sense of almost betrayal -- that what we tried to do, in terms of doing the right thing by our victims, was somehow truncated or somehow not followed through by the federal authorities," Parker said.


Assistant State Attorney General John Skidmore says that when the APD probe was halted in 2004, prosecutors were not ready to file charges against Allen, due to faulty or unreliable recollections by apparent victims about the dates of their alleged abuse.


"Would we have found something else? Would we have been successful if the investigation went on? I really can't speculate as to that."


More recently, state prosecutors thought they had identified a viable case against Allen for flying a prostitute to anchorage -- a violation of the federal Mann Act.


But the U.S. Department of Justice refused to turn over its files or to deputize state attorneys to proceed with a prosecution on their behalf.


"There was no rationale offered. It was just simply that they were not going to do it. They're not required to explain themselves to us, and to my knowledge they have not."


But U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski might not take no for an answer.


Her spokesman issued a statement in regard to a federal judge's order concerning an investigation into the prosecution of the late Senator Ted Stevens:


"The senator is examining all the materials released yesterday and is considering taking further action. We're in an information-gathering phase presently, though, and don't want to get ahead of ourselves."


In the meantime, it is unknown whether the federal government allowed a perpetrator of sex crimes back out on the streets.


The Department of Law's request for “cross-designation” for a possible prosecution of Bill Allen under the Mann Act was made a year ago tomorrow.


Deputy Attorney General Rick Svobodny says he met this February with DOJ officials in Washington to pursue the matter.


But the answer remained no.


You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

akFlea said on Thursday, Dec 1 at 10:11 PM

Here is an interesting mystery. Up to about a year ago there was a reference on the internet to someone very similar to this Bill Allen, who had been pardoned by Richard Nixon. Same name, similar hobbies, same age etc. That internet source is not available anymore.

77774134
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Governor Frank Murkowski said on Sunday, Nov 27 at 10:29 AM

What that means folks is the FRANK THE TANK in 2003 reversed the Statute of Limitiations... so if the feds don't want to get off their azzes and prosecute then the families have to.. That is why one needs a PITBULL ATTORNEY... hu Palin??? See Todd use to buy weed and coke from a dealer that DNA busted him for a rape of an 8 yr old girl in 1991...and in 2006 there was an executive order to investigate the dealers brother and Sarah convinced the Palmer DA to not prosecute...sound familiar??? sounds to me like a lawsuit will bring the plantiff a lot of money for gross negligance and trust fund fraud...what money will do!!!!

77531381
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

not to worry said on Saturday, Nov 26 at 4:21 PM

when sen lisa hears about this she will make sure justice is served

77506183
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

not again said on Saturday, Nov 26 at 4:19 PM

did they forget to tell the feds to follow the law again?

77506148
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

WHATS NEW? DOUBLE STANDARDS said on Thursday, Nov 24 at 9:33 AM

If your rich, have connections you do not get prosecuted. SIMPLE FACT...he definately paid someone off. JUDGEMENT DAY when the ole kook dies, will be another story. He will not get off and will PAY for his filthy low life crimes on the victims.He is disgusting.

77429083
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

SoldierOfFortunes said on Thursday, Nov 24 at 12:21 AM

Well it sounds like money was involved...lol. it is the USA way of life...who cares about kids...expecially when worth alot of $$$... Mum is the federal word hu??? Money Money Money

77416991
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.