What's in the Republican Budget Plan?

Tools

By Jill Jackson / CBS News

Representative Paul Ryan, R-Wisconsin

House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan unveiled a budget Tuesday that looks extremely similar to last year's plan with one major difference: it eliminates the budget deficit in 10 years rather than the 25+ years in his past plans.

Democrats predicted that acceleration to balance the budget to lead to an even more divisive budget filled with unpopular cuts to domestic programs that benefit the poor.

Ryan's budget blueprint for fiscal year 2014, titled "The Path to Prosperity," does include the same cuts and reforms to Medicaid, food stamps and education programs that were in his last budget and limits future spending growth to just 3.4 percent down from 4.9 percent.

The plan claims deficit reduction over the next 10 years totaling $4.6 trillion, which is really accomplished by curbing that future spending instead of actual new cuts, is also similar to his last plan that Democrats painted as too severe.

"Our opponents will shout austerity, but let's put this in perspective," Ryan wrote in an op-ed published today in the Wall Street Journal. "On the current path, we'll spend $46 trillion over the next 10 years. Under our proposal, we'll spend $41 trillion. On the current path, spending will increase by 5% each year. Under our proposal, it will increase by 3.4%. Because the U.S. economy will grow faster than spending, the budget will balance by 2023, and debt held by the public will drop to just over half the size of the economy."

Ryan admitted in an interview Sunday that the budget will balance faster largely due to the last-minute fiscal cliff deal reached earlier this year. That gave Ryan's deficit-cutting efforts a boost by raising over $600 billion in new revenue through higher taxes on families making over $450,000 a year and individuals making $400,000.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has vowed that President Obama will not get any more tax revenue from House Republicans and Ryan's budget sticks to that. His blueprint once again proposes closing tax loopholes and using the savings there to lower rates for all individuals and businesses instead of putting that money towards deficit reduction.

Ryan also included language once again proposing to defund the President's health care law despite the Supreme Court upholding the law. And on Medicare, Ryan stuck to his controversial proposal to overhaul the health program for seniors for everyone now under 55. The budget chairman had toyed with the idea of raising that age level to accomplish more savings, but did not find members willing to break their promise that any Medicare changes would only hit people now under the age of 55.

The budget would also shield the Defense Department from the sequester for the next 10 years.

One thing is clear, this budget is very different from what is expected from Senate Democrats tomorrow or from the president next month. Senate Budget Committee chairman Patty Murray, D-Wash., plans to introduce a budget that raises taxes on the wealthy and does not aim to balance the budget deficit.

1234 Next

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Guest said on Tuesday, Mar 12 at 11:23 AM

Just more of the lets only cut what we don't want and keep the things (Defense) that we want. GOP if you expect tough cuts to things traditionally supported by Democrats, why do you support a plan that doesn't expect the same tough cuts to things traditionally supported by the GOP? Belt tightening should be universal and impact everything. And why close loopholes just to pass that on to everyone else? That is a net 0 change and is only used to appeal to some. We already had the Bush tax cuts be permanent when they were intended to be temporary. I understand you don't want people to be dependent on the government. Neither do I. But how many of you have heard or used the phrase "Give a man a fish and it feeds him for a day,Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime"? It makes sense right? Then why are we cutting things that teach (education) a man to fish (make a living)? You know if we spent the amount of money on education as we do on defense a lot of our problems would cease.

115785591
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.