Five Big Issues For The New Congress

Tools

By Stephanie Condon / CBS News

The 112th Congress was the least productive in 65 years, and it had the poor approval ratings to show for it.

If the new Congress, which was sworn in on Thursday, wants to polish up the legislative branch's reputation, there's plenty of opportunity. The 113th session is primed to make progress -- if it wants to -- on a number of significant issues, such as gun control, immigration, energy and taxes.

After the last Congress capped off its session with the dismally partisan "fiscal cliff" debate, it's unclear how functional Capitol Hill lawmakers will be this year, but here's a look at the issues they could tackle:

1. Fiscal issues

First and foremost, the new Congress will have to address the fiscal issues left on the table after the "fiscal cliff" deal was passed in the final hours of the 112th Congress.

Around mid-February, the Treasury Department is expected to exhaust its borrowing authority. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner announced in late December that Treasury was already resorting to accounting tricks to skirt the $16.4 trillion limit. If Congress doesn't raise the limit, the federal government risks defaulting on its loans.

Additionally, Congress in February will have to address the "sequester" -- cuts amounting to $1.2 trillion over 10 years, hitting both the Pentagon and domestic programs. Both Democrats and Republicans think the across-the-board cuts should be scrapped or at least replaced with more strategic cuts. The "sequester" cuts were supposed to start this month, but the "fiscal cliff" deal passed on Jan. 1 deferred them for two months.

Meanwhile, on March 27, the last "continuing resolution" is set to expire. The "continuing resolution" is the bill Congress passed after it failed to pass a real federal budget. If it fails to pass another "continuing resolution" before the current one expires, some federal operations could shut down temporarily.

2. Immigration

The president has made clear that immigration reform is his top priority in his second term.

"I will introduce legislation in the first year to get that done," Mr. Obama said Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press." "I think we have talked about it long enough. We know how we can fix it. We can do it in a comprehensive way that the American people support."

Mr. Obama's immigration reform package will reportedly include a path to citizenship for the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants, strengthened border security, an easier means of bringing in foreign workers under special visas, and stricter penalties for employers who hire undocumented workers. The White House is also reportedly planning a "social media blitz" to sell the package.

Republicans have plenty of motivation to work with the president and Democrats on this issue after Latino voters roundly rejected the GOP's presidential candidate, siding with Mr. Obama over Mitt Romney, 71 percent to 27 percent.

123 Next

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Kathleen Tonn/ Move the Mountain Ministries... said on Monday, Jan 28 at 5:54 PM

Has Senator McCain considered the viability of requiring illigal immigrants to join the armed forces? By imposing a two year term of service, the U.S. will find out just how much the illegals value America. The benefit to them is citizenship, training and an opportunity for a college education! Why not? What could possibly impinge on rolling this out? If congress could roll out Chapter 33 when the VA was not even prepared, couldn't congress step up and create a reasonable immigration policy such as was just described?

112406335
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

don't steal... said on Monday, Jan 7 at 10:29 AM

the government hates competition...debate over...

110781462
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:56 PM

Just to clarify there are two of us guests (Guest and guest). But I noticed he/she was thinking faster than he/she was typing as well. So if anyone wants to debate Guest (me) my posts were at 2:58pm and 3:05pm.

110616922
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

had much coffee today guest? said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:46 PM

lol...just kidding...

110616415
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:25 PM

Start w/house n senate n president taking pay cuts and have to live within their means. No additional fees or earnings from outside thier offices- only pay they get are from their paychecks-no special interests... just like joe civilian. Their pay needs to be reflected in thier job performance or in line w/how they do thier job. Nothing should be an entitlement, everything needs to be earned. They have to live under thier laws that they past first and foremost. I know that they have to feel like they did their job by passing laws... but there should be limits. republic vs democratic-which do we need. Simplify everything... they need to they are only at a 10th grade level, according to some report; taxes, bills, writings need not be convoluted so no one can understand them. no polls allowed- no special interests that cover this or that. KISS everything.

110615472
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 4:05 PM

I know this is a broken record but when Clinton left office we had a surplus. Meaning we were taking in more than we were spending. Bush comes along and says that is your money so he gave us a tax break. All along passing medicare part D which the CBO said would raise costs. He also started two unfunded wars that have yet to be paid for. If we would have stayed the course Clinton laid out for us our debt would be half of what it is now and shrinking. Unless we want to bury our children and grandchildren in debt the hard choices (cuts and tax increases) have to be made. No one will like it but it is what needs to be done.

110614655
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Guest said on Friday, Jan 4 at 3:58 PM

As far as the spending goes as a left leaning independent I know cuts have to be made. But it just can't be a across the board cut. There are things that the government does need to do. From what I see the left only wants defense cuts and the right only wants social cuts. If the right wants to cut social programs then they should be willing to match those cuts on the defense end. Once we have a balanced budget we ultimately need more taxes. I know that is blasphemous to the right but hear me out. Once the budget is balanced we have to tackle the debt. If we cut to much to achieve that goal it could hurt the economy and Americans. We should be taking in anywhere between 15-20% over the budget (and not for more spending as some on the right will try to scare you with). 5-6% of that goes just towards the interest alone leaving the remaining to bring the debt down. Once the debt is down (which will take decades) then and only then can taxes go back down to a balanced budget level.

110614361
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.