Does Obama's Gun Control Plan Have a Chance?

Tools

By Brian Montopoli / CBS News

On Wednesday, President Obama initiated 23 executive actions designed to help combat gun violence. But as he himself acknowledged, there's only so much he can do on his own. The "most important" changes, he said, need to go through Congress.

"To make a real and lasting difference, Congress too must act," said the president. "And Congress must act soon."

There are three main actions that the president wants Congress to take. The first is to mandate background checks for anyone who wants to buy a gun. (Right now, gun buyers who want to avoid background checks can, for instance, purchase a gun from a private seller at a gun show.) The second is to reinstate the ban on military-style assault weapons and limit ammunition magazines to 10 rounds. And the third is to confirm Todd Jones as director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Congress has not confirmed an ATF director in six years, and the president argued that doing so would improve the ability of that organization to help law enforcement in combating gun violence.

The president is also calling on Congress to ban armor-piercing bullets and pass new gun trafficking laws, pass his $4 billion plan that would provide funding for 15,000 police officers, and "end the freeze" on funding public health research on gun violence.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said soon after Mr. Obama's remarks that he is "committed to ensuring that the Senate will consider legislation that addresses gun violence and other aspects of violence in our society early this year." Democratic lawmakers plan to introduce an "updated" bill to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines on January 24, and the Senate Judiciary Committee plans to hold its first hearing on the proposals on January 30.

Getting the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster and pass a bill in the Democrat-led Senate won't be easy: The vast majority of Republicans as well as a minority of Democrats (mostly from the West and South) have traditionally been averse to new gun control legislation, and while some have softened their stance in the wake of the Newtown massacre, there remains considerable skepticism around passing what would be the most ambitious gun control legislation in decades.

"I will fight proposals in the Senate that threaten our Second Amendment rights and fail to take real action to curb a culture of gun violence in America," Pat Roberts, R-Kan., said Wednesday. "I fully support enforcing the gun laws currently on the books instead of creating new ones that erode basic rights of self-protection." Added Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa: "The President seems to think that the Second Amendment can be tossed aside."

Getting the plan through the Senate is the (relatively) easy part. There is even more opposition in the GOP-led House, where Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, could simply refuse to bring the proposal up for a vote. (Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said Wednesday that House committees will review the president's plan, "[a]nd if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that.") Many conservative House Republicans have already made clear they have no interest in passing the president's plan.

123 Next

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

freedom fighter said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 4:00 PM

barack hussein obama - enemy of real freedom loving americans!!

111576501
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 4:03 PM

We need leadership, a path forward, and a loosening of our freedoms. This guy is more concerned with giving us drugs and GMO's so that his lawyer buddies can sue on our behalf... Pretty much sums this guy up...

111576641
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 6:19 PM

Let's throw billions of dollars at gun control and see if it gets any further than the billions thrown at drug enforcement! All this accomplishes is causing everyone to load up on guns and ammo before the laws (possibly) change. If and when the laws do change, everyone will be armed to the teeth already! Anchorage is full of felons who have Ak's, AR's and handguns in their possession. What exactly is going to change THAT? Criminals ignore the law, and the rest of us are starting to come around to that way of thinking too!

111585101
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

cooljulie said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 6:53 PM

Not only that (DEA failure), what about the f*ed up govt operations that sent so many guns to Mexico and other places? They aren't exactly the role model for gun control!

111587041
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Adament Mother said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 10:37 PM

Assault weapons were developed FOR MILITARY TO HUNT HUMANS! There is NO place for them. in civil society. No one needs an assault weapon to protect their property ..shot gun anyone? You'll get the bad Guy! Banning assault weapons DOES NOT violate 2nd Ammend ment Rights! Shot guns are effective enough for defense. If u want to use assault weapons....please go joinour military! Background checks!! YES!! I am appalled that ANY gun is sold without the background check! Criminal negligence for allowing no accountability. So far there are ZERO evidence that legalizing assault weapons has been POSITIVE! Only TRAGEDY has resulted. I have a serious doubt of the trustworthy-ness of anyone who buys at a gun show WITHOUT a background check. Legal or not, this practice points to people with suspect motives. Shame on the vendors for allowing the sale of assault weapons at gun shows! NO ONE NEEDS ASSAULT WEAPONS...except the next criminal! 'Like' is not 'need' an assault weapon.

111596931
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Define said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 11:17 PM

Mother define assault weapon. A baseball bat can be an assault weapon so can a knife, a car, or the media. According to the Democrats, showing an ID card to vote disenfranchises minorities and elderly and natives. Also the Obama administration is responsible for thousands of deaths in Mexico for his gun running scheme, he is a criminal? Or are you being selective in your rant? Also you know the gun show follow state laws right? or you are you regurgitating what you have been spoon fed. Ex in Cal, 10 day waiting and check, so people at Cal gun shows have to wait 10 days and be checked. Another issue with all this flap. The mil has problems with people going to see mental health "specialists" because of the stigma attached. The mil has been trying to do away with the stigma to try and get more people to get help. So how does the lib agenda help this? It doesn't, In my opinion, mil folks will avoid help so that they will not end up on a list. Your false anger is wasted on the wrong group.

111598031
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mommy said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 11:26 PM

Mother you should think before you post and stop watching MSN. But good luck with your feeble minded tirade. It is directed in the wrong direction. Educate yourself, then come back and try to post as a thoughtful adult. DO I think 30 round clips are nuts, sure, do I think I could pack 20 10 round clips, or 40 5 rounds clips and swap them fast, sure. Do I think you have no clue, sure. Are the democrats a responsible party or the media. Nope. But you just keep thinking as you do. Keeps everyone else safer.

111598281
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Just a Guess said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 11:44 PM

I'm going to guess that "Adamant Mother" (Except spelled right) has no clue what a shot gun full of buckshot can do. Or that it knows how many rounds an automatic or semi automatic shotgun can hold, or how fast one can be reloaded. But from the uneducated rant it is easy to know where "Adament Mother" (spelled wrong from public education and brain washing} got it's ideas. But that is the problem with letting liberals into Alaska for so long. They are ruining the state. Time to stand up and be silent no more.

111598961
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

So when said on Thursday, Jan 17 at 11:49 PM

Is KTVA going to do a gun story that matters? Oh wait, never, they have KTUU hand me down running it now.

111599092
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Sunday, Jan 20 at 9:42 PM

It worked for Hitler, nothing bad happened in Germany when he did it..... What would an overbearing illigitimate regime do with an unarmed country?? Ask the Jews.... It was great for them I hear. People should read about the Rise & Fall of the Third Reich before the march with obama. They're identical in every way. Do the research.

111805902
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Daniel said on Sunday, Jan 20 at 9:43 PM

President Barack Obama could not pass a background check if he was applying for a gun permit or a job. Why has this man been allowed to remain in office or take the oath for a second time? During the 2008 campaign, it was known that: •His official, long form birth records were SEALED. •His Occidental College records were SEALED. •His Columbia College records were SEALED. •His Harvard College records were SEALED. •His College thesis – SEALED. •His Harvard Law Review articles – SEALED. •His Indonesian adoption records – SEALED. •His passport file – SEALED. •His medical records – Unavailable •His baptism records – Unavailable •His papers from his service in the Illinois legislature – Unavailable •His Illinois State Bar Association records – Unavailable The birth certificate that the White House released is reputed by document experts to be false. The Social Security number he has used was issued to someone else. He could not pass an E-Verify test.

111805921
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mike said on Thursday, Jan 24 at 2:16 PM

Adamant Mother, the debate isn't about whether or not anyone "needs" assault weapons, it's about your right as an American to own one. After people like you put their emotions aside they will be able to make educated decisions. There are things I don't think belong in civilized society either, nuclear weapons, pit bulls, the electric chair, people who don’t shower, Satanism, but just because I don't agree with it doesn't mean it should be banned, it's people's right as American citizens to own/do these things and when talking about weapons, it's even covered by the Constitution! Shootings are tragic but cars and alcohol kill more people and they aren’t covered by the Constitution so by your logic should we ban them? I still don’t know what an “assault weapon” is. I have a shotgun at home with a pistol grip for home security but with the current law trying to be passed it would be deemed an assault weapon and therefore illegal for future purchase. It only holds 4 rounds, are the lawmak

112102552
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mike said on Thursday, Jan 24 at 2:20 PM

@Adamant Mother, the debate isn't about whether or not anyone "needs" assault weapons, it's about your right as an American. After people put their emotions aside they will make educated decisions. There are things I don't think belong in civilized society either, nuclear weapons, pit bulls, Satanism, but just because I don't agree doesn't mean it should be banned, it's our right as Americans to own/do these things and when talking about weapons, it's covered by the Constitution! Shootings are tragic but cars and alcohol kill more people and they aren’t covered by the Constitution so by your logic should we ban them? I don’t know what an assault weapon is. I have a shotgun at home with a pistol grip for security but with the law trying to be passed it would be deemed an assault weapon and illegal for future purchase. It holds 4 rounds, are lawmakers and supporters really looking at this or just shooting from the hip (pun intended). Remove the emotion, prosecute the criminals and provid

112102831
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.