As Oil Tax Vote Nears, Two ConocoPhillips Employees Under Scrutiny

Senators declare conflict of interest; required to vote anyway

Tools

By Bill McAllister
Bio

JUNEAU - As the Senate nears a vote on a major oil tax bill, the spotlight is turning on two senators who work for ConocoPhillips.

But there is little chance the two Republicans will abstain from voting.

Kevin Meyer of Anchorage and Peter Micciche of Soldotna have been key players in the oil tax debate this session, Meyer as co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee and Micciche as co-chair of the Special Committee on TAPS Throughput.

Now the group Backbone is asking them to recuse themselves from voting, or else to actually vote against Senate Bill 21, to avoid the perception of a conflict of interest.

Backbone is the group that formed in 1999 to protest BP's planned acquisition of Arco's North Slope assets.

It was unsuccessful last year in supporting the Senate bipartisan majority, which was dismantled by the election results.

The oil tax bill would cost the state treasury an estimated $6.4 billion through 2019.

Governor Parnell and other supporters have said it's necessary to attract more industry investment and increase production on the North Slope.

The bill originally was scheduled for action on the Senate floor Monday, but that has been pushed back to Wednesday, apparently indicating that the vote will be close.

Tuesday on the Senate floor, Meyer and Micciche went through the familiar ritual of declaring a conflict of interest.

"There may be concern with some that my employment outside of my duty as a state senator may present a conflict of interest in the matters of interest before this body today,” Meyer said. “So I would move and ask unanimous consent to be excused from the vote on SB 21, due to a perceived conflict of interest."

Senate President Charlie Huggins responded: "Object. We have an objection."

Then Micciche rose. "I'm employed in the natural gas industry by an oil company and there may be a perceived or actual conflict of interest. So I also move and ask unanimous consent to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest or any perception of a conflict."

A senator was heard to say "object," and Huggins noted it. "We have an objection, Senator Micciche."

Because other senators objected, Meyer and Micciche are expected to vote.

But with the issue so momentous and the vote expected to be so close, Backbone said the two should either not vote or vote no.

“We're making political decisions based on the commercial influence of the oil industry, and I think that's a very sad place for us to be today," said David Gottstein of Backbone.

Gottstein said with Meyer and Micciche now required to vote, he does not have much hope that they will find a way to avoid voting for the bill.

Anchorage Democrat Bill Wielechowski, who was a member of the bipartisan group Backbone supported in the 2012 election, was visibly angry on the Senate floor as he questioned Meyer about the bill.

Wielechowski followed it up with an email blast passing along suggestions he's received for alternative uses of $6.4 billion.

Among them: Give every high school senior a free four-year college education for the next 150 years, or pay every Alaskan’s property tax bill for the next six and a half years.

Meanwhile, House Democrats lamented the fact that the bill reached the Senate floor in its current form.

At their weekly press availability, members of the minority said that the hit to the state budget would imperil the state.

They continued to describe SB 21 as an unnecessary giveaway to multi-national corporations that don't need it.

"If you want to give this money away to the oil companies, do you want to take the safe drinking water and the safe sewage system away from the villages?" asked Rep. Max Gruenberg, D-Anchorage.

"I will tell you that there [is] no amount of budget-cutting that can offset the multi-billion-dollar giveaway that's happening right now," said Rep. Chris Tuck, D-Anchorage.

The Democrats say they can only support tax breaks if they are contingent upon production of new oil.

But in the House, the minority is outgunned by 30 to 10.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Big Oil Crooks said on Friday, Mar 22 at 12:06 AM

Business as usual for a state controlled by republicans who are bought by big oil, and us regular folks get screwed as usual......

116660391
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

David T Wenzlau said on Thursday, Mar 21 at 8:21 AM

Capital Punishment for Corporate Criminals

116608771
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Exiled said on Wednesday, Mar 20 at 6:06 PM

pre k is a waste of money, that aside, start a state income tax and make up the diff on the fly in workers, say 30 percent state tax to start.

116568661
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

midnitesun731 said on Tuesday, Mar 19 at 7:46 PM

Disgusting giving this money away while cutting Pre-k education. Unforgivable. Do your jobs senators you owe the people of Alaska not to give away Our oil.

116490371
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KTVA CBS 11 | Anchorage, Alaska News and Weather and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.